Do As Infinity- 化身の獣 mp4 download

Connect to Spotify. A new version of Last. View all tracks. View all albums. Scrobbling is when Last. Learn more. Add event View all events. Add image 64 more photos. Add image 76 more photos. Don't want to see ads? Upgrade Now. Javascript is required to view shouts on this page.

Go directly to shout page. View all similar artists. View all trending tracks. Loading player…. Scrobble from Spotify? Connect to Spotify Dismiss. Search Search. Join others and track this artist Scrobble, find and rediscover music with a Last.

Sign Up to Last. Years Active — present 22 years. Do As Infinity is a Japanese pop rock band. In their greatest hits album Do The Best achieved million sales in Japan. The group disbanded in September and performed their last live concert a… read more.

They were formed in Tokyo in , and debuted a… read more. Related Tags j-pop japanese j-rock female vocalists jpop Add tags View all tags. Similar To Every Little Thing. Buy Loading. More Love this track. Albums Sorted by: Most popular Most popular By release date. Play album Buy Loading. Similar Artists Play all. Trending Tracks 1. Play track. Love this track. More Love this track Set track as current obsession Get track Loading.

Wednesday 26 May Thursday 27 May Friday 28 May Saturday 29 May Sunday 30 May Monday 31 May Tuesday 1 June Wednesday 2 June Thursday 3 June Friday 4 June Saturday 5 June Sunday 6 June Monday 7 June Tuesday 8 June Wednesday 9 June Thursday 10 June Friday 11 June Saturday 12 June Sunday 13 June Monday 14 June Tuesday 15 June Wednesday 16 June Thursday 17 June Friday 18 June Saturday 19 June Sunday 20 June Monday 21 June Tuesday 22 June Wednesday 23 June Thursday 24 June Friday 25 June Saturday 26 June Sunday 27 June Monday 28 June Tuesday 29 June Wednesday 30 June Thursday 1 July Friday 2 July Saturday 3 July Sunday 4 July Monday 5 July Tuesday 6 July Wednesday 7 July Thursday 8 July Friday 9 July Saturday 10 July Sunday 11 July Monday 12 July Tuesday 13 July Wednesday 14 July Thursday 15 July Friday 16 July Saturday 17 July Sunday 18 July Monday 19 July Tuesday 20 July Wednesday 21 July Thursday 22 July Friday 23 July Saturday 24 July Sunday 25 July Monday 26 July Tuesday 27 July Wednesday 28 July Thursday 29 July Friday 30 July Saturday 31 July Sunday 1 August Monday 2 August Tuesday 3 August Wednesday 4 August Thursday 5 August Friday 6 August In the same way, you might think an infinite number of miles takes you further than an infinite number of centimetres.

In fact, the centimetres that go to make up the infinitely many miles can be put into one-to-one correspondence with the centimetres that go to make up the infinitely many centimeteres, so both take you the same distance. How about the rational numbers? In the case of the natural numbers and the integers, it was easy to check we'd counted every number in a given range. This is because between any two rationals, there is another rational. Between -2 and 4 there are seven integers including -2 and 4 and four natural numbers.

There are, however, infinitely many rationals. How, then, could we possibly count them? We can never get anything in a given range, and there are infinitely many non-overlapping ranges we could be given. In fact, if there are infinitely many naturals which there are and infinitely many integers which, again, there are then surely there must be infinity-squared many rationals, because to get all the rationals you take each integer in turn and divide it by each natural number in turn, as in the following table:.

The first thing to do is to take a deep breath and remember that infinity is not a number. In fact, the rationals are countable. To prove this, consider the above table. If it's on the table, then we know we've got all the positive rationals there.

Is it there? So, we have a complete list. However, trying to count along each row or column in turn gives problems - each row and column is infinitely long, after all, and so we'll never reach the end of the first to start on the second. Is there, then, a way of counting them without missing any out? Just follow the red line in the image below:. So we know we've counted every rational at least once.

Have we counted them at most once? Obviously, we haven't. Why does this matter? It's a good habit to get into, certainly, but more than that it's useful here to convince ourselves that these sets of numbers are all the same size.

If we don't check we're not counting the rationals too many times, what's to stop there being more natural numbers than there are rational ones? Intuitively, this seems to be a fairly silly fear after all, the natural numbers are just the first column of the entire table of rationals but if you're not doubting your intuition by this stage, I haven't explained what we're doing well enough. We could just check each number we reach against all the previous numbers, making sure it's not equal to any of them.

That would work, but ignores the fact that the order in which we're counting these numbers means the first time we meet each one, it's in its simplest possible form. Hence the positive rationals can be put into one-to-one correspondence with the naturals, and so are countably infinite. Then, just as we did with the integers, start at 0 and interleave the two lists:.

Thus the natural numbers are countable, the integers are countable and the rationals are countable. It seems as if everything is countable, and therefore all the infinite sets of numbers you can care to mention - even ones our intuition tells contain more objects than there are natural numbers - are the same size. Are the real numbers countable? Every other set of numbers we've met so far has been countable.

Each new set of numbers that feels as if it should be larger than the set of the natural numbers has been put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers - all we needed was to work out how to list the numbers sensibly. The real numbers are made up of the rationals and the irrationals. The rationals are countable, so if the irrationals are countable then the reals must be countable - just interleave our two systematic lists and we'll get another systematic list.

For the same reason, if the reals aren't countable, we'll know that the problem comes with the irrationals. You've probably met rational numbers in at least two guises - one is that they can be written as one integer divided by another, and the other is that they can be written as decimal expansions that eventually become repeating patterns.

In fact, all real numbers can be represented as infinitely long decimal expansions. The rationals are the ones that eventually repeat and the irrationals are the ones that don't. Now, suppose the real numbers were countable. Then we could write a systematic list of all the real numbers. What is more, we could do it as list of decimal expansions. We might run into trouble with repeating a number without realising it 0. It might be that the system we use to list the numbers lends itself to a neater method, as we found with the rationals, but even if it doesn't, this method will work.

One way of answering this question is to assume our list is, in fact, infinitely long. Then is it possible for it to contain every possible real number?

The answer is that it isn't. Not all infinities are, we finally see, the same size. The problem, however - one raised and answered by Georg Cantor - is how to show this. How can we write down or describe a number that we know won't be on the list? Before reading on, take a moment to think about this yourself. It may help to think back to the title of this section: Cantor's Diagonal Proof. And it's not the second number, because the second digits don't agree.

We could still run into the problem mentioned earlier, that some numbers with recurring digits are the same number, even when the digits are different. This means the list isn't complete, and can never be complete. However cunning our system, even if the list is infinitely long it won't contain every real number.

This means that we can't count all the real numbers - there are uncountably infinitely many.